[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 10-all-redirect.patch
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: 10-all-redirect.patch |
Date: |
06 Mar 2001 19:35:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
> >>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Akim> FYI, here is the result on the fileutils:
>
> Akim> @@ -307,8 +307,8 @@
> Akim> END { for (i in files) print i; }'`; \
> Akim> test -z "$(ETAGS_ARGS)config.h.in$$unique$(LISP)$$tags" \
> Akim> || etags $(ETAGS_ARGS) $$tags config.h.in $$unique $(LISP)
> Akim> -all: all-redirect
> Akim> -
> Akim> +all: config.h
> Akim> + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) all-recursive
>
> I'm concerned by this.
> `all' should be the first target in Makefile.in. But this makes it
> look like it comes after TAGS.
> Why?
Because it's an output from makesort, not from diff per se, and
makesort just sorts alphabetically. The `+all' is affected just like
`-all' was, but in the actual output the order is fine.