Re: FYI: `make distcheck' non-interactive again

[Pavel Roskin]

Hello, Tom!

> Thanks.
> BTW this is the sort of thing that we can check for in
> `maintainer-check'.  That way we can easily find out if we've
> accidentally written a new test that will break.

Libtool has a test (sh.test) that checks for suspicious constructs in
ltmain.sh. But it would be harder to process *.am and automake.in.

Speaking of "rm" without "-f", there is one more place where it can be
found.

ChangeLog:
        * java.am: Use `rm -f' instead of `rm'.

____________________
--- java.am
+++ java.am
@@ -53,4 +53,4 @@

 .PHONY clean-am: clean-%DIR%JAVA:
 clean-%DIR%JAVA:
-       -rm *.class class%DIR%.stamp
+       -rm -f *.class class%DIR%.stamp
____________________

Regards,
Pavel Roskin