[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question marks in Makefile.in
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Question marks in Makefile.in |
Date: |
26 Feb 2001 16:49:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:
> I mean, this check is _probably_ not necessary on a user system, since the
> users will use well tested versions of Automake. But I don't have a strong
> opinion. A fast and simple check should not be a big deal.
>
> Developers of Automake, however, should always be sure that such variables
> are not left in the output.
Ah, OK, I missed that point, thanks.
Nonetheless, given that we can never be sure to what extend the test
suite exercise Automake, I would include it anyway: better have
automake dying than make. Just imagine
?SOME-CONDITION-RARELY-TRUE? %SOME-PARAM-WE-FORGOT%.
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, (continued)
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: Question marks in Makefile.in, Lars J. Aas, 2001/02/26