[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testsuite fails
From: |
Derek R. Price |
Subject: |
Re: Testsuite fails |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:59:21 -0500 |
Tom Tromey wrote:
> I imagine we'll have to radically revamp the test suite when we move
> to using autoconf's tracing feature. The current test suite is very
> dumb and doesn't usually generate a correct configure.in.
I'm working on this so I can test my conversion. I've been reading the
puropse lines and I haven't noticed anything that looks like it's going
to ba a major problem yet, but can anybody else think of anything in
particular I should watch out for?
I'm just about through the 'c's and it's been pretty straightforward so
far. Mostly just adding AC_INIT, AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, & AC_OUTPUT, then
calling $ACLOCAL before calling $AUTOMAKE. The tests I've fixed work
with and without amtraces as well.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:address@hidden OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
I will not torment the emotionally frail.
I will not torment the emotionally frail.
I will not torment the emotionally frail...
- Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_
- Re: Testsuite fails, (continued)
- Re: Testsuite fails, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/18
- Re: Testsuite fails, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/18
- Re: Testsuite fails, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/19
- Re: Testsuite fails, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/22
- Re: Testsuite fails, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2001/02/25
- Re: Testsuite fails, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/25
- Re: Testsuite fails, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2001/02/26
- Re: Testsuite fails, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/27
Re: Testsuite fails, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/19
Re: Testsuite fails,
Derek R. Price <=