[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rpath command?
From: |
Olly Betts |
Subject: |
Re: rpath command? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 18:38:32 +0000 |
In message <address@hidden>, Alexandre Oliva writes:
>[linking a library from other libraries with no object files]
>
>The point is that this just can't be done portably.
Since libtool's major purpose is to allow libraries to be built using a
portable interface, perhaps it should take care of this for the developer?
So on platforms where this doesn't work, perhaps libtool should add a dummy
file implicitly, rather than the developer having to implement the bodge
themselves?
>(ii) automake wouldn't know which compiler/linker to use for the
>library you're creating. Specifying one or more source files is
>supposed to give automake a clue on which languages are being used in
>the sub-libraries.
This would be an obstacle to libtool creating the bodge file, but the .la
file could be extended to contain information about languages used in a
libtool library.
Cheers,
Olly