[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scripts in pkglibexecdir?
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: Scripts in pkglibexecdir? |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:22:53 +0100 |
On 01/03/2012 01:06 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 12:09 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-03 09:09:
>>> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
>>> index fa1e75e..fbc2e59 100644
>>> --- a/NEWS
>>> +++ b/NEWS
>>> @@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ New in 1.11.0a:
>>>
>>> Bugs fixed in 1.11.0a:
>>>
>>> +* Bugs introduced by 1.11.2:
>>> +
>>> + - Automake does not erroneously flag the valid `pkglibexec_SCRIPTS'
>>> + prefix/primary combination as invalid.
>>> +
>>
>> Error: too many negations
>>
>> I don't understand that sentence and can't be sure what was fixed
>> and what the bug was...
>>
> What about this then?
>
> - Automake correctly recognizes the prefix/primary combination
> `pkglibexec_SCRIPTS' as valid.
>
I did one more little tweak, and went for this finally:
- Automake now correctly recognizes the prefix/primary combination
`pkglibexec_SCRIPTS' as valid.
More importantly, I've made the following adjustment to the test
`primary-prefix-invalid-couples.test', to avoid a spurious failure:
--- a/tests/primary-prefix-invalid-couples.test
+++ b/tests/primary-prefix-invalid-couples.test
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ for primary in $primaries; do
prefixes_ok='bin sbin libexec pkglibexec'
;;
SCRIPTS)
- prefixes_ok='bin sbin libexec pkgdata'
+ prefixes_ok='bin sbin libexec pkglibexec pkgdata'
;;
DATA)
prefixes_ok='data dataroot pkgdata doc html dvi pdf ps
I've then pushed the patch.
Thanks,
Stefano