automake-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] {testsuite-work} tests: autogenerate list of wrapped tests f


From: Stefano Lattarini
Subject: Re: [PATCH] {testsuite-work} tests: autogenerate list of wrapped tests for `lib/' shell scripts
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:19:39 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; )

On Monday 13 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 June 2011, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +# FIXME: this list might probably be made auto-generated, like
> > > > +# $(parallel_tests) is...  But would that worth the hassle?
> > > > +config_shell_tests = \
> > > > +  compile-w.shtst \
> > > > +  compile2-w.shtst \
> > > > +  compile3-w.shtst \
> > > > +  compile4-w.shtst \
> > > > +  compile5-w.shtst \
> > > > +  compile6-w.shtst \
> > > > +  instsh2-w.shtst \
> > > > +  instsh3-w.shtst \
> > > > +  mkinst3-w.shtst \
> > > > +  missing-w.shtst \
> > > > +  missing2-w.shtst \
> > > > +  missing3-w.shtst \
> > > > +  missing5-w.shtst
> > > 
> > > I expected to see the ar-lib tests here? Or did you not add those
> > > since the AM_PROG_AR macro hasn't been merged? But would it hurt
> > > to test ar-lib with $SHELL prior to that merge?
> > >
> > No, this is just a stupid oversight on my part, sorry.  Which probably
> > shows that we indeed should make this list automatically-generated
> > after all.  But that's for a follow-up patch IMHO.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> >   Stefano
> > 
> And here it is.  I'll push in 48 hours if there is no objection by then.
> 
Pushed now.

Regards,
  Stefano



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]