[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1
From: |
Peter Rosin |
Subject: |
Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:16:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 |
Den 2010-11-16 12:15 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
> On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Den 2010-11-15 23:23 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:19:44AM CET:
>>>> This is based off of master (but I guess it also applies to tests-init)
>>>> but the backport to the msvc branch is trivial. I "stole" the xsi-test
>>>> from libtool.
>>>>
>>>> Would be good if someone tested on that Alpha before pushing I suppose.
>>>
>>> Patch is ok if we also have test coverage of 'compile' in non-MSVC mode
>>> on this system (so we can be sure that the shell doesn't barf skipping
>>> over the XSI code bits). You can omit dropping the output as you like.
>>> Thanks for the quick feedback!
>>
>> compile.test and compile2.test still covers the original non-msvc stuff,
>> and they PASS according to your log.
>>
>> Now I wonder where I should commit this and how it should find its way
>> to master. If I commit to tests-init, we need to backport to msvc and
>> maint before 1.11.2 or we'll face failing tests there.
>>
>> Should I first commit to msvc, then merge and fixup the defs.in->defs
>> change when going to tests-init and then merge to master?
> I think you won't need to fixup the defs.in->defs renaming; git should
> be smart enough to handle this automatically (it does so in the manual
> checks I've performed). So IMHO you should apply the patch to msvc,
> and then merge msvc to tests-init.
I committed to msvc, merged into tests-init and merged tests-init into
master. And pushed.
The rename was handled just fine as you said, but there was one trivial
conflict caused by the churn in the tests-init branch.
Cheers,
Peter
- Re: Testsuite failures on AIX 5.3, (continued)
- Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1 (was: testsuite results from master), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/14
- Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1, Peter Rosin, 2010/11/14
- Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/15
- Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1, Peter Rosin, 2010/11/16
- Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/16
- Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1,
Peter Rosin <=
- Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/16
- Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/16
Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/15
- Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/15
- backcompat5.test: avoid '##'-style comments inside recipe commands. (was: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/16
- Shell comments in make rules (was: backcompat5.test: avoid '##'-style comments inside recipe commands), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/16
- Re: Shell comments in make rules (was: backcompat5.test: avoid '##'-style comments inside recipe commands), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/16
- Re: Shell comments in make rules, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/16
- Re: Shell comments in make rules, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/16
- Re: Shell comments in make rules, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/16