Re: New auxiliary archive script

[Andrew W. Nosenko]

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 09:03, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> Darn, we need another name: 'archive' is likely too common when automake
> is going to put all files with that name in the distribution of each
> package using Automake.  No need to send another patch, but any other
> good suggestions that fit in with the existing scripts?
>
> I don't find arlib so bad, except that it sounds a bit like a library
> rather than a program.
>
> Suggestions appreciated.

am-archive ?
am-archive-helper ?

-- 
Andrew W. Nosenko <address@hidden>