Re: Parallel tests execution [0/4]

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Jim,

* Jim Meyering wrote on Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:13:54PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 12) allow for additional output on stdout/stderr?
> >     example: test was skipped because of $reason.
> 
> This would be nice.
> It'd would be useful also to mark as "surprising" or
> "highly undesirable" the results of certain tests.
> Better than a simple "yes" or "no".

Hmm.  Maybe let another fd dup stderr?

> I'll give it a spin in coreutils soon.

I tried it.  check passes, but ditstcheck fails at some point.
I haven't had time to analyze it yet, though, which is why I didn't
report it yet.

Thanks,
Ralf