Re: config.rpath missing

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Bruno,

* Bruno Haible wrote on Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:39:08PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> 
> > Should Automake ... add config.rpath, as suggested in Stepan's
> > patch, or do you foresee any incompatibilites this way?
> 
> This would make it hard to make config.rpath and lib-link.m4 evolve: a
> user could have got lib-link.m4 from gettextize and config.rpath from
> automake, and then we get into a version mess.

Yes.

> > > The following tests failed, because
> > > automake wasn't able to --add-missing config.rpath:
> > >     gettext.test gettext2.test subcond.test
> 
> Is there no other way to fix the tests?

There certainly is:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-05/msg00034.html
I merely wanted this clarified -- thanks!

(When you're looking at the patch proposed in the link, it would be nice
if you could check whether I got the logic for AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION
right in automake/tests/gettext.test.)

Cheers,
Ralf