|
From: | Akim Demaille |
Subject: | Re: FYI: LDADD/LIBADD doc |
Date: | Sun, 02 Feb 2003 11:36:38 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) |
adl> Automake uses `LIBADD' for any kind of libraries. This fixes adl> the manual which used to say `LDADD' was also for shared libraries. What is the point of having two syntaxes now? Can't they be just aliases?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |