[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE
From: |
Sébastien Hinderer |
Subject: |
Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:35:17 +0200 |
Dear Bob,
Many thanks for your repsonse!
Bob Friesenhahn (2023/09/11 11:28 -0500):
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I am writing with a quesiton about the AC_SYS_LARGEFILE macro.
> >
> > It would be great to be able to use it but according to its
> > documentation, the macro adds its flags to the CC output variable, which
> > is not convenient in my context because we have dedicated variables not
> > only for C flags but also for C preprocessor flags. Thus, what I'd
> > ideally need is a version of the macro where I can somehow specify what to
> > do with both large-file related CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS.
>
> The pre-processor and linker options produced are not like normal
> pre-processor and linker options so they are treated differently. If they
> are not submitted via CC / LD, then the final result might not work
> properly.
That's surprising to me. Even if those options are needed all the way
down, why wouldn't CFLAGS be enough? Also for a -D optionI am
assuminigthat there is only the C preprocessor whichknos what to do
with it?
Best wishes,
Sébastien.
- AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Sébastien Hinderer, 2023/09/11
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Bob Friesenhahn, 2023/09/11
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE,
Sébastien Hinderer <=
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Nick Bowler, 2023/09/11
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Russ Allbery, 2023/09/11
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Paul Eggert, 2023/09/11
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Sébastien Hinderer, 2023/09/18
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Paul Eggert, 2023/09/18
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Sébastien Hinderer, 2023/09/19
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Paul Eggert, 2023/09/19
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Evgeny Grin, 2023/09/20
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Paul Eggert, 2023/09/20
- Re: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, Evgeny Grin, 2023/09/21