[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools
From: |
Nick Bowler |
Subject: |
Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:33:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) |
On 2014-09-04 13:47 -0400, Shawn H Corey wrote:
> I have just added an article to my blog on my programming language
> about the GNU AutoTools. Please feel free to comment.
>
> http://kori-programming-language.blogspot.ca/2014/09/a-closer-look-at-gnu-autotools.html
Quoted from the linked page:
> After some investigation, I discovered that the documentation for GNU
> AutoTools was crappy. This is surprising considering how long it has
> been in use. ☹
Can you be more constructive? I think Autoconf and Automake have rather
good manuals[1][2]. Why are they crappy? How can we make them better?
[1] https://gnu.org/s/autoconf/manual/autoconf.html
[2] https://gnu.org/s/automake/manual/automake.html
Thanks,
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
- A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, Shawn H Corey, 2014/09/04
- Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, John Spencer, 2014/09/04
- Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools,
Nick Bowler <=
- Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, Shawn H Corey, 2014/09/04
- Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, Nick Bowler, 2014/09/04
- Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, Shawn H Corey, 2014/09/04
- Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, Paul Eggert, 2014/09/04
- Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, Shawn H Corey, 2014/09/04
- Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, Paul Eggert, 2014/09/04
- Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, Shawn H Corey, 2014/09/05
- Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, Zé, 2014/09/12
- RE: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, John Calcote, 2014/09/04
- Re: A Closer Look at GNU AutoTools, Shawn H Corey, 2014/09/04