[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems |
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 2013 12:22:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Monday 20 May 2013 10:37:00 Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/18/2013 05:45 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 16:05 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >> Yes. It would have been really useful if autofoo used whatever is in
> >> /usr/share/misc, unless there is a config.sub.override or
> >> config.guess.override file in the source directory (or even better,
> >> something pointed to by environment variables), and deprecate
> >> source-directory config.guess and config.sub.
> >
> > My original patch didn't allow overrides, here is an updated one.
>
> I would MUCH rather see us honor a CONFIG_GUESS and CONFIG_SUB
> environment variable, rather than baking in a PATH search. This topic
> has come up in the past, where I made the same request back then.
this might be sufficient for distro packagers (once they're "in the know" that
they have to export these two), but that doesn't help people who download
arbitrary packages and run `./configure` themselves.
what if the autoconf macros grew a new option/macro so that in the very
uncommon case that someone has written their own, they could explicitly
declare so ?
AC_CANONICAL_CUSTOM
this would disable the custom search path and only respect the env vars
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Mike Frysinger, 2013/05/22
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Eric Blake, 2013/05/20
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Paul Wise, 2013/05/20
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Eric Blake, 2013/05/20
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Paul Smith, 2013/05/20
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Wookey, 2013/05/20
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Eric Blake, 2013/05/20
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Eric Blake, 2013/05/22
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Mike Frysinger, 2013/05/22
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Eric Blake, 2013/05/23
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Mike Frysinger, 2013/05/23
- Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems, Mike Frysinger, 2013/05/22