[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:09:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 16:35:30 Wesley Smith wrote:
> >> For 64bit builds, I need to #define x86_64 for a lib I'm using. It
> >> has nothing to do with the size of longs from my perspective, but
> >> whether the binary is compiled for a 64 or 32 bit target.
> >
> > is it a binary-only library ? if it's open source, encoding the arch in
> > the name is a dumb convention that only causes misery.
>
> I don't disagree, but let's consider this an academic exercise at this
> point. I'd actually like to know how to do this regardless of whether
> it violates anyones code sensibilities.
which is why i gave you some ideas about how to address the issue. but you
need to clarify your exact usage and/or whether the suggestions given work.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, (continued)
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Wesley Smith, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Mike Frysinger, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Wesley Smith, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Raphael 'kena' Poss, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Wesley Smith, 2010/06/30
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Andrew W. Nosenko, 2010/06/30
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, John Calcote, 2010/06/30
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Wesley Smith, 2010/06/30
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/30
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Russ Allbery, 2010/06/29
- Re: determining 32 v. 64 bit compilatio, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/06/29