[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Getting a list of available C compilers
From: |
Steffen Dettmer |
Subject: |
Re: Getting a list of available C compilers |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:58:30 +0100 |
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> names='gcc gcc[0-9_-]* cc c89 c99 cgcc clang llvm-gcc sdcc tcc
> xlc xlc_r bgxlc icc ecc pgcc pathcc ccc nvcc cl bcc bcc32'
> ... dir in $PATH /usr/ucb,ext in '' .exe ...
> cand=$dir/$name$ext
> if test -f "$cand"; then
interesting that this looks for "cl.exe" but not for "CL.EXE". I
though uppercase would be correct - at least what is installed by
default, so we called our wrapper script (for linux+WINE as build, for
win32 as host) also uppercase.
Was this wrong?
Is anyone using cl? Where?
On windows, configure (.sh) cannot be run, so what is used? WINE, cygwin, MSYS?
Steffen
- Re: Getting a list of available C compilers,
Steffen Dettmer <=