[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: iterating over arguments
From: |
Sam Steingold |
Subject: |
Re: iterating over arguments |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:29:55 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090625) |
Eric Blake wrote:
any rate, using 'autoconf --trace=_CL_CLISP_REQUIRE_FEATURE_2' would show
what the result of m4_toupper turns out to be in this case.
running this:
autoconf --trace=CL_CLISP
hangs forever without any output.
(cvs with this patch:
Index: src/m4/clisp.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/clisp/clisp/src/m4/clisp.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -w -p -F^(def -r1.13 clisp.m4
--- src/m4/clisp.m4 13 Sep 2009 05:18:19 -0000 1.13
+++ src/m4/clisp.m4 14 Sep 2009 15:28:22 -0000
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ if test "$cl_use_clisp" != "no"; then
fi
fi
m4_foreach_w([cl_feat], [$1],
-[AC_CACHE_CHECK([for cl_feat in CLISP], [cl_cv_clisp_]cl_feat,
+[m4_pushdef([CL_FEAT], [m4_toupper([cl_feat])])dnl
+AC_CACHE_CHECK([for CL_FEAT in CLISP], [cl_cv_clisp_]cl_feat,
[CLISP_SET([cl_cv_clisp_]cl_feat,[[#+]]cl_feat[[ "yes" #-]]cl_feat[[ "no"]])])
-test $cl_cv_clisp_]cl_feat[ = no && AC_MSG_ERROR([no ]cl_feat[ in CLISP])])])
+test $cl_cv_clisp_]cl_feat[ = no && AC_MSG_ERROR([no ]cl_feat[ in CLISP])
+m4_popdef([CL_FEAT])])])
)
- Re: iterating over arguments, (continued)
- Re: iterating over arguments, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/09/13
- Re: iterating over arguments, Sam Steingold, 2009/09/13
- Re: iterating over arguments, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/09/13
- Re: iterating over arguments, Sam Steingold, 2009/09/13
- Re: iterating over arguments, Eric Blake, 2009/09/14
- Re: iterating over arguments, Eric Blake, 2009/09/14
- Re: iterating over arguments,
Sam Steingold <=
- Re: iterating over arguments, Eric Blake, 2009/09/14
- Re: iterating over arguments, Sam Steingold, 2009/09/14
- Re: iterating over arguments, Eric Blake, 2009/09/14
- Re: iterating over arguments, Sam Steingold, 2009/09/14
- Re: iterating over arguments, Eric Blake, 2009/09/14
- Re: iterating over arguments, Sam Steingold, 2009/09/14
- Re: iterating over arguments, Eric Blake, 2009/09/14
- Re: iterating over arguments, Sam Steingold, 2009/09/14
- Re: iterating over arguments, Eric Blake, 2009/09/14
- Re: iterating over arguments, Sam Steingold, 2009/09/14