[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL
From: |
Stefan Bienert |
Subject: |
Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL |
Date: |
Wed, 13 May 2009 23:05:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090510) |
> Wating for you to implement it. ;-)
Well, I suspected something like this...right now I'm on some contrib'
to gnulib, then I have promised the automake people to try to help and
then I could try to make a satisfying implementation of AS_FOR...wait!
I've to clean my flat before everything else ;-)
> Accepting an initial value by the user from the command line or the
> environment, as I wrote earlier. Sorry for the being terse.
Oh, this would be neat. Where's the problem with not initialising SB_FOOS?
greetings,
Stefan
- AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Stefan Bienert, 2009/05/12
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Stefan Bienert, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Stefan Bienert, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL,
Stefan Bienert <=
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/14
- Message not available
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/15
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Eric Blake, 2009/05/13