[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:55:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
* NightStrike wrote on Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:50:00AM CET:
> On 3/13/08, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > I think you are looking at a different manual version than your autoscan
> > version. At least the current autoscan recommends none of these macros
> > any more AFAICS, and at a glance I could not find any others either.
>
> $ autoscan --version
> autoscan (GNU Autoconf) 2.61
> ..and using this manual --
> http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf.html
Oops. I retract that, the autoscan annotations were fixed only after
2.61, sorry.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, (continued)
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/13
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, NightStrike, 2008/03/13
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/13
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, NightStrike, 2008/03/13
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/13
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, NightStrike, 2008/03/13
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/13
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, NightStrike, 2008/03/13
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/13
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, NightStrike, 2008/03/13
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/13