[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh
From: |
Roman Rybalko |
Subject: |
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:00:23 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) |
> aclocal will use the value of ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in your top-level
> Makefile.am, so you can do something like:
> ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I build-aux
Is it really works ?
I tried this somewhen, but it wasn't working.
Anybody, tell me plz the docs about this. I've red some docs, but don't
found any info about this. Thx.
- autoreconf vs autogen.sh, David Bruce, 2007/08/24
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/25
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh,
Roman Rybalko <=
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Noah Misch, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Andreas Schwab, 2007/08/27
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Noah Misch, 2007/08/25
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/25