[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co |
Date: |
Wed, 30 May 2007 09:57:57 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Stepan Kasal <address@hidden> writes:
> And yes, it sounds inconsistent. IMVHO the ac_cv_c_ prefix should be
> changed to ac_cv_type_ here. What do others think?
The former expands to an actual type (e.g., 'unsigned char') whereas
the latter expands to 'yes' or 'no'. So they're not quite the same, no?
I suppose things could be handled more felicitously, but I don't see a
bug in the current approach.
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, (continued)
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Eric Blake, 2007/05/28
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Stepan Kasal, 2007/05/28
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/29
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/29
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/29
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Stepan Kasal, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Stepan Kasal, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Stepan Kasal, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/31
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/29
Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/29