[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problem
From: |
J.R. Yang \(jryang\) |
Subject: |
RE: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problems - HELP |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:10:36 -0500 |
Here's the original e-mail, which has the specific errors:
Thanks,
- JRY
------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
I did some search on the web and found some solutions to some of the
known issues. I was able to run buildconf, and ./configure scripts. The
libtool was created in proper places. However, when I start the
compiling ("make"), I got some errors in C code and C++ code.
In C code base, I got some warnings (which turned into Error, -Werror
option), complaining about "const";
In C++ code base, there're lot of errors look like this:
/usr/include/c++/3.2.3/bits/locale_facets.h: At global scope:
/usr/include/c++/3.2.3/bits/locale_facets.h:1348: ISO C++ forbids
in-class
initialization of non-const static member `intl'
/usr/include/c++/3.2.3/bits/locale_facets.h: In instantiation of
`std::moneypunct<char, true>':
/usr/include/c++/3.2.3/bits/locale_facets.h:1461: instantiated from
here
/usr/include/c++/3.2.3/bits/locale_facets.h:1348: ISO C++ forbids
in-class
initialization of non-const static member `std::moneypunct<char,
true>::intl
'
Did anyone out there experience the same problem?
Thanks in advance!
- JRY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Ralf
Wildenhues
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 3:54 PM
To: Thomas Dickey
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57,I experienced some
problems - HELP
* Thomas Dickey wrote on Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:15:12PM CET:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >2.57 was released six years ago. I don't think you can expect much
> >help
>
> four years as of last week.
Ouch, apologies for that misread of mine.
> (however, it is not an unreasonable expectation from people that an
> application be evolved in a upwardly compatible series of versions,
> and that its maintainers can occasionally point out where interesting
> bugs were fixed).
Sure. Could you provide details?
Cheers,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
- After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problems - HELP, J.R. Yang \(jryang\), 2006/12/06
- Re: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problems - HELP, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/12/06
- Re: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problems - HELP, Thomas Dickey, 2006/12/06
- Re: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problems - HELP, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/12/06
- Re: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problems - HELP, Thomas Dickey, 2006/12/06
- Re: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problems - HELP, Andreas Schwab, 2006/12/06
- Re: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problems - HELP, Thomas Dickey, 2006/12/06
- Re: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problems - HELP, Andreas Schwab, 2006/12/07
- Re: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problems - HELP, Thomas Dickey, 2006/12/07
- RE: After upgrade autoconf from 1.13 to 2.57, I experienced some problems - HELP,
J.R. Yang \(jryang\) <=