[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES
From: |
David Fang |
Subject: |
AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:04:19 -0500 (EST) |
Hi,
Is there a way to produce a header file at configure time using
AC_CONFIG_HEADERS, *and* have it perform AC_SUBST-itutions on the files,
like AC_CONFIG_FILES?
What I'd like is AC_CONFIG_FILES to also perform a difference
check on the output files before overwriting them, just the way
AC_CONFIG_HEADERS does. (Is this a safe and easy request to accommodate?)
In my case, these output files are headers at the leaves of deep
dependency-chains (not all C/C++).
I basically do NOT want to AC_DEFINE such variables because they
will end up changing config.h -- I'd rather have these variables isolated
from config.h. Another idea could be to provide an option in AC_DEFINE to
retarget to another file besides the default "config.h"?
Any ideas?
David Fang
- AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES,
David Fang <=
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/12/15
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, David Fang, 2005/12/17
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, David Fang, 2005/12/17
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Harlan Stenn, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, David Fang, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Harlan Stenn, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/12/19
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Harlan Stenn, 2005/12/19
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Bruce Korb, 2005/12/19