[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files
From: |
Eric Siegerman |
Subject: |
Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:25:00 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:20:48PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Well, systems where ls -ld behaves differently aren't all that
> uncommon. For instance, on some AFS installations you'll get only
> three bits of permission instead of the usual nine.
Yikes! Ok, I stand corrected.
Of course, the people who wrote those incompatible ls's should be
<nasty punishment deleted>; "-rwxrwxrwx" format output
*absolutely* goes back to V6.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. address@hidden
| | /
It must be said that they would have sounded better if the singer
wouldn't throw his fellow band members to the ground and toss the
drum kit around during songs.
- Patrick Lenneau
- Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files, (continued)
- Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files, Eric Sunshine, 2003/12/10
- Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files, Paul Jarc, 2003/12/10
- Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files, Eric Sunshine, 2003/12/10
- Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files, Paul Jarc, 2003/12/10
- Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files, Eric Sunshine, 2003/12/10
- Re: [patch] Keep sanity in autotools, Bruce Korb, 2003/12/10
- Re: [patch] Keep sanity in autotools, Eric Sunshine, 2003/12/10
- Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files, Eric Siegerman, 2003/12/10
- Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2003/12/10
- Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files, Eric Sunshine, 2003/12/10
- Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files,
Eric Siegerman <=
Re: [patch] Keep executability of config.status-ed files v3, Jan Kratochvil, 2003/12/10