[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Portability of preprocessor directives
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: Portability of preprocessor directives |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:43:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:33:00PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> "Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I'm interested even in compilers that might have shipped prior to the
> > last decade, if they're used, but I'm not interested in compilers that
> > no one uses anymore for any practical work.
...
> Most real C compilers had #elif support added in the late 1980s, as it
most but not all. HPUX 9.x's C compiler trashed files starting with an #elif
(that's in the early 90's - within the scope of his request).
--
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
- Re: Portability of preprocessor directives, Paul D. Smith, 2003/03/09
- Re: Portability of preprocessor directives, Paul Eggert, 2003/03/10
- Re: Portability of preprocessor directives,
Thomas Dickey <=
- Re: Portability of preprocessor directives, Paul Eggert, 2003/03/10
- Re: Portability of preprocessor directives, Earnie Boyd, 2003/03/10
- Re: Portability of preprocessor directives, Thomas Dickey, 2003/03/10
- Re: Portability of preprocessor directives, Earnie Boyd, 2003/03/11
- Re: Portability of preprocessor directives, Thomas Dickey, 2003/03/11
- Re: Portability of preprocessor directives, Andreas Buening, 2003/03/11
- Re: OT - Packages maintaining source for systems no longersupported [WAS: Re: Portability of preprocessor directives], Earnie Boyd, 2003/03/12
- Re: OT - Packages maintaining source for systems no longersupported [WAS: Re: Portability of preprocessor directives], Thomas Dickey, 2003/03/12
- Re: OT - Packages maintaining source for systems no longersupported [WAS: Re: Portability of preprocessor directives], Earnie Boyd, 2003/03/12
- Re: OT - Packages maintaining source for systems no longersupported [WAS: Re: Portability of preprocessor directives], Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/03/12