[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Site Macro Directory
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: Site Macro Directory |
Date: |
Fri, 24 May 2002 13:17:05 -0700 |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm not sure this is necessary. No package is strictly speaking
> self-contained. If, say, my package depends on GTK, then I rely on GTK
> being installed somewhere before I start building. And therefore it could
> also be reasonable to assume that the gtk.m4 file with the GTK macros can
> be found before I start running autoconf.
The especially fun thing is that you cannot rely on the GTK *re*packagers
to do the right thing. *Maybe* they would be more careful with "gtk.m4"
than they were with "guile-config", but not necessarily. I now have
to try to find the guile config without guile-config. Yummy.
- Re: Site Macro Directory, (continued)
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Akim Demaille, 2002/05/24
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Akim Demaille, 2002/05/24
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Akim Demaille, 2002/05/24
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Akim Demaille, 2002/05/24
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Mark D. Roth, 2002/05/24
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Paul Eggert, 2002/05/24
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Akim Demaille, 2002/05/26
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Mark D. Roth, 2002/05/26
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Akim Demaille, 2002/05/24
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Peter Eisentraut, 2002/05/24
- Re: Site Macro Directory,
Bruce Korb <=
- Message not available
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Paul Eggert, 2002/05/16
- Re: Site Macro Directory, Guido Draheim, 2002/05/16
Re: Site Macro Directory, Thomas Dickey, 2002/05/15