[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: c99
From: |
vishnu |
Subject: |
Re: c99 |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Oct 2001 12:15:45 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.20i |
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 09:07:54PM +0200, Guido Draheim wrote:
> > No, that's silly. i'm not going to litter my code with #ifdefs
> > for old compilers. More realistically, i just want configure to
> > suggest upgrading gcc if the installed gcc doesn't support C99.
> > Something like that.
>
> however you will notice that many many compilers out there do not
> support your style - at least not now.
Of course but i can't go back. The ability to declare variables
anywhere is fantastic. i'm not even tempted to use C++ anymore. :-)
> Your code is not (yet) quite
> portable but making it portable at least throughout gcc makes still
> fine for a good share of computer space. I support what Pauls remark
> points at but then again, you can use autoconf to detect differences
> on platforms that have a gcc... and there are surely quite some..:-O
--
Victory to the Divine Mother!!
http://sahajayoga.org
- c99, vishnu, 2001/10/12
- Re: c99, Guido Draheim, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, Guido Draheim, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, Guido Draheim, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99,
vishnu <=
- Re: c99, Guido Draheim, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/14
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/14
- Re: c99, Guido Draheim, 2001/10/14
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/18
- Subscribe/unsubscribe, Sang Nguyen Minh, 2001/10/18