[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2001 05:46:49 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > [...] may be there are some hints whether people have already tried with
> > borland compilers.
>
> Let's hope they are reading this list and will step forward to discuss it ;)
sure - Borland C is much faster, and checks for errors that gcc doesn't
bother to report. But there's no point in discussing it, since people
who use both compilers already have their minds set.
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, (continued)
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/05/23
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/23
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Mike Castle, 2001/05/23
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/05/24
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Mike Castle, 2001/05/24
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Ralf Corsepius, 2001/05/24
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/05/24
Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Axel Thimm, 2001/05/24