[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH |
Date: |
02 Feb 2001 12:30:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Crater Lake) |
| On Jan 31, 2001, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
| >>>>>> "Markus" == Markus F X J Oberhumer <address@hidden> writes:
| Markus> After a look through the sources it seems that AS_EXECUTABLE_P
| Markus> should use both "test -f" and "test -x" on systems that
| Markus> support it, and "test -f" otherwise (DOS, Win, ...)
|
| > Good call, I was going to text ! -x.
|
| Huh?
Doh! s/-x/-d/g.
| How about test -x $f && test ! -d $f ?
Yeah, indeed. There are few chances to meet some other kind of
special files in here.
Still, `-f' is definitely better where we can use it. The question
is, `is test -x my-dir positive on DOS environments'? If so, then on
this arg the second `test' can be just `:'.
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, (continued)
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Earnie Boyd, 2001/02/02
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/02
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/03
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/03
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/19
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Earnie Boyd, 2001/02/19
RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Tim Van Holder, 2001/02/04
Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH,
Akim Demaille <=
RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2001/02/02