[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
remaining patches (was: [PATCH] build: support autobuild)
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
remaining patches (was: [PATCH] build: support autobuild) |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:23:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
* Eric Blake wrote on Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 01:05:50AM CEST:
> Any other last-minute patches to include before I start the release
> process? Right now, it looks like I will have things out the door
> on Monday.
All stuff that I have is either not ready for prime time yet (sorry
Peter) or can wait. I suppose I'll try to fix some of the testsuite
failures in the posted logs, but so far none look like deal-breakers,
and I'll let you deal with any resulting patches.
I've considered adding a few names to lib/autom4te.in speculatively,
since Automake will be needing more of those. I'm not sure if that
is sensible before we have code, but it sure could help not having
to require unreleased Autoconf; as of now, I'm not aware of these
new macro branches needing other support in Autoconf explicitly.
Names I'm currently thinking of:
AM_POT_TOOLS
AM_XGETTEXT_OPTION
AM_NLS all three for the pot-primary branch
AM_MAKEFILE_INCLUDE for some unfinished include feature
_AM_MAKEFILE_INCLUDE alternatively, an internal helper macro
AM_PATH_GUILE for addition of Guile support
AM_PROG_MOV for the QT patches
What do you think? Just add them, and garbage-collect later in case
that was overly optimistic?
Thanks,
Ralf
Re: autobuild logs for Autoconf, Eric Blake, 2010/09/17