Re: AC_INIT regression

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Paul Eggert wrote on Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 07:54:54PM CEST:
> On 07/11/10 00:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > I think it's not too bad to _document_ the change and apply
> > this patch for 2.68 or 2.69 if we get many complaints (which I doubt
> > we'll get).
> 
> That sounds reasonable to me as well.  It's important to get
> 2.67 out fairly soon, since the "int *" bug is relatively important.
> Let's not hold up the release over less-pressing issues.

Well, I'm having hardware troubles, and running out of time to do
anything productive before Sunday at the earliest, at which point
IIUC Eric will be back, so he might be in a better position to do
2.67.

Sorry,
Ralf