Re: [PATCH] Don't expose AC_{COMPILE, LINK}_IFELSE internals in document

autoconf-patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Don't expose AC_{COMPILE, LINK}_IFELSE internals in document

From:	Stefano Lattarini
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Don't expose AC_{COMPILE, LINK}_IFELSE internals in documentation.
Date:	Mon, 31 May 2010 19:14:20 +0200
User-agent:	KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.3.4; i686; ; )

> > > better to document external variables like $EXEEXT than to
> > > expose internal details like $ac_exeext; so it seems like
> > > AC_LINK_IFELSE should be the subject of the patch.
> >
> > And AC_COMPILE_IFELSE too, since its documentation mentions
> > $ac_object.
> 
> Done in the attached patch.
> 
ping ping?

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[PATCH] Fix minor inconsistency in documentation of AC_{LINK, RUN}_IFELSE., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/05/25
- Re: [PATCH] Fix minor inconsistency in documentation of AC_{LINK, RUN}_IFELSE., Eric Blake, 2010/05/25
  - Re: [PATCH] Fix minor inconsistency in documentation of AC_{LINK, RUN}_IFELSE., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/05/25
    - [PATCH] Don't expose AC_{COMPILE, LINK}_IFELSE internals in documentation., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/05/25
    - Re: [PATCH] Don't expose AC_{COMPILE, LINK}_IFELSE internals in documentation., Stefano Lattarini <=

Prev by Date: [PATCH] Don't expose AC_{COMPILE, LINK}_IFELSE internals in documentation.
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Don't expose AC_{COMPILE, LINK}_IFELSE internals in documentation.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread