[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EUnit failure?
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: EUnit failure? |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:56:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-15) |
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:24:35AM CEST:
> On 08/11/2009 01:20 AM, Romain Lenglet wrote:
> >When renaming the directory, you only rename the library. But the modules in
> >can still be loaded (module names are independent from library names).
> >However, any inclusion of a library header file from it, like
> >"eunit/include/eunit.hrl" will fail, since this depends on the library name.
>
> If this is what Ralf did, I guess the explanation makes sense.
I didn't actively do anything with my Erlang installation though.
If you can tell me what to look out for, I can try to debug it tonight.
> Next time, breaking the thread is not a huge problem but please keep
> autoconf-patches in the recipients.
You can get at raw list mails on gmane.org, selecting the direct link to
a post, and adding "/raw".
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: EUnit failure?, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/11
- Re: EUnit failure?,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: EUnit failure?, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/11
- Re: EUnit failure?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/08/11
- Re: EUnit failure?, Romain Lenglet, 2009/08/11
- Re: EUnit failure?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/08/13
- Re: EUnit failure?, Romain Lenglet, 2009/08/18
- Re: EUnit failure?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/08/18
- Re: EUnit failure?, Romain Lenglet, 2009/08/18
- Re: EUnit failure?, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/19
- Re: EUnit failure?, Romain Lenglet, 2009/08/19
- Re: EUnit failure?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/08/19