[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `cat` vs. read
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: `cat` vs. read |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:54:52 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 10/27/2008 4:36 PM:
> The Solaris one prints "as_func_failure succeeded.", the OSF one won't
> run the configure script at all, for more than a few lines.
So neither one really matters - they won't even get as far into the script
where we use read.
>
> Your proposed workaround sounds like a nice idea to me; and you'll have
> more w32 experience anyway.
With that review, I've applied the patch.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkkGfvwACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDIuACgj2QzYczvN5mMTKHzxv9KCiik
Q2oAnR97Ib6G+gs1ET6RcjPsnigE/+s7
=ciGh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----