[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4 |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:13:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 03:08:24PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >> I prefer yours and almost went that way myself, but wonder if it's
> >> portable enough. I don't see any other uses of 'if...fi <', in autoconf.
> >
> > Yes, that's pretty portable. IIRC it may create a subshell, but that
> > doesn't matter here.
>
> "pretty portable" may not be enough for autoconf ;-)
It's very portable. Really.
> Since there seem to be no other uses of that idiom
> in autoconf, I'm leery about introducing the first.
We use
for var in $list; do
$cmds
done | $cmd
a lot in autotools, and it's just the same thing.
You can blame me if we hit a bug here.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, (continued)
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Working os/2 configuratie, Elbert Pol, 2008/04/05
- Re: Working os/2 configuratie, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Elbert Pol, 2008/04/06
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
Re: Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, ziedar, 2008/04/06