[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4 |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Apr 2008 07:05:49 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 4/5/2008 6:54 AM:
|>
|> then it would make a difference. The original aim was that users should
|> be able to substitute any characters they like (except for \0). And the
|> above is not so unlikely if the configure script itself happens to be
|> converted to w32 text mode.
|
| Good to know I wasn't preserving that code for nothing ;-)
| I'll add a comment to that effect.
|
I'd like to see the revised patch, but at this point, I think the concept
of the patch seems minimally invasive enough: it helps out Elbert's case,
without changing the behavior on previously tested platforms. So I'm
leaning towards allowing it prior to releasing 2.62.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkf3eS0ACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDSBwCggfOaSY7TVfaCuUEYbF3pums/
mQ0An2gxN4cLfyhGCH9hrqr6InBoHgjM
=DpPj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, (continued)
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Elbert Pol, 2008/04/06
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4,
Eric Blake <=
Re: Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, ziedar, 2008/04/06