Hello Benoit,
Thanks for the patch.
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 04:43:27PM CET:
+2007-10-31 Benoit Sigoure <address@hidden>
+
+ Adjust the documentation of autotest WRT atlocal.
+ * doc/autoconf.texi (Making testsuite Scripts): It is not necessary
+ to write a rule to produce atlocal since it's an AC_CONFIG_FILES.
+ Mention that atlocal.in needs to be distributed, not atconfig.in.
[...]
--- a/doc/autoconf.texi
+++ b/doc/autoconf.texi
@@ -20244,15 +20244,10 @@ subdir = tests
atconfig: $(top_builddir)/config.status
cd $(top_builddir) && \
$(SHELL) ./config.status $(subdir)/$@@
-
-atlocal: $(srcdir)/atlocal.in $(top_builddir)/config.status
- cd $(top_builddir) && \
- $(SHELL) ./config.status $(subdir)/$@@
@end example
This paragraph starts with
| With strict Autoconf, you might need to add lines inspired from the
| following:
meaning that you would need those lines only when not using Automake.
Only Automake adds the atlocal rebuilding rule for you, given
AC_CONFIG_FILES(atlocal...).
@noindent
-and manage to have @file{atconfig.in} and @code{$(EXTRA_DIST)}
-distributed.
+and manage to have @file{atlocal.in} distributed.
Again, without using Automake, the developer must ensure that the
stuff
listed further up in EXTRA_DIST is being distributed.
Is the section too difficult to understand? If yes, how can it be
improved?