Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

[Richard Guenther]

On 12/30/06, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> For example, GCC itself assumes wrapv semantics internally,
> but according to the -fwrapv opponents GCC is obviously "at
> fault" here and should be fixed, so that shouldn't count,
> right?  (If that's the way the data will be collected, I
> think I know how things will turn out.  :-)

Where does GCC assume wrapv semantics?
GCC assumes two's complement arithmetic in the backend - but
that's different as it's not ISO C it is generating but target machine
assembly code.

Richard.