[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:49:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
Hello Paul and Ralf,
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:19:41PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Paul Eggert wrote on Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:21:02PM CEST:
> > [...] /usr/posix/bin/sh and it's buggy.
> >
> > I have installed the following patch [...]
> Yes, I guess that's probably the right decision. But you cannot use
I also agree that the main idea if the patch is good.
But it has bundled several other changes, which are IMHO
controversial.
I think we should break the patch to individual parts, and apply each
one after a review. I think it will be more readable to generate
them relatively to the previous state of the CVS. So, to have a
``clean base'' in CVS, I took the liberty to back out Paul's original
patch for now.
I will break the patch into the ``individual parts'' and add my
comments tomorrow. (I'm in a hurry right now.)
Paul, I hope I have not offended you. I suppose you know how much I
value your tremendous work!
Stepan Kasal
> > 2006-10-04 Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> >
> > * doc/autoconf.texi (Special Shell Variables): Autoconf-generated
> > shell scripts no longer export BIN_SH, due to configuration
> > hassles with this. See, for example, Tonya Underwood's report
> > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2006-10/msg00003.html>.
> > * lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4 (AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE): Don't set BIN_SH
> > or DUALCASE.
> > (_AS_DETECT_BETTER_SHELL): Don't look in /usr/bin/posix.
> > Use AS_EXECUTABLE_P rather than test -f.
> > (AS_SHELL_SANITIZE): Set DUALCASE.
> > (AS_EXECUTABLE_P): Just invoke as_executable_p.
> > (_AS_TEST_PREPARE): Default to test -f, rather than to nothing.
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/04
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/10/06
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed, Stepan Kasal, 2006/10/09
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/11
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/11
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed, Stepan Kasal, 2006/10/12
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/12
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/10/12
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/12
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/11
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.60] testsuite: 3 120 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/10/12