autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:40:30 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Hi Stepan,

* Stepan Kasal wrote on Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:40:33AM CEST:
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:43:11AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> 
> > Most of this patch has nothing to do with the original goal of avoiding some
> > spurious `testsuite' rebuilds, [...]
> 
> Yes, you are right.  There are two changes:
>  1) mktests.sh is no longer a maintainer tool, thus $(TESTSUITE_GENERATED_AT)
>     are no longer distributed,
>  2) avoid spurious rebuilds.
> 
> But I realized this too late, so I left it as a combined patch.

Which means I'll ignore this for 2.60.

> > They do expose folks who simply want to run the test suite of an unmodified
> > Autoconf to any portability problems in `mktests.sh'.
> 
> I understand that mktests.sh is no longer considered maintainer-only, so this
> should be OK.

Dangerous.  I don't like this much.

Please note that you mix up cause and effect here: the effort to make
mktests.sh more portable was caused by the fact that the build system
failed to not update the generated tests, not the other way round.

> Moreover I made the change discussed elsewhere that mktests.sh should
> fail in the created *.at file happens to be empty.

You forgot to adjust the part in the trap.

> +$(TESTSUITE): $(TESTSUITE_dependencies) $(AUTOCONF_FILES)
> +     $(srcdir)/mktests.sh $(AUTOCONF_FILES)
> +     test ! -f $@ || mv $@ address@hidden
> +     $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) address@hidden
> +     touch address@hidden
>       mv address@hidden $@
>  
> +$(TESTSUITE).tmp: $(TESTSUITE_dependencies) $(TESTSUITE_GENERATED_AT)
> +     cd $(top_builddir)/lib/autotest && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) autotest.m4f
> +     $(AUTOTEST) -I $(srcdir) suite.at -o $@

I don't like a genuine target name that ends in `.tmp' much, to be
honest.

Cheers,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]