[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:16:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi Stepan,
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 12:58:31PM CET:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 06:02:15PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > (Obsolete Macros): Document AC_FOREACH.
>
> Ii'm not sure whether AC_FOREACH should be documented.
>
> ``Obsolete Macros'' is an ``attic'' for macros which were documented
> before they became deprecated.
Right.
> Yes, AC_FOREACH is relatively widely used, but if it managed to escape
> documentation for so long, we should accept its victory now. ;-)
Did you mean "we should not accept its victory now"?
Look, the chapter says:
| You may completely skip this chapter if you are new to Autoconf. Its
| intention is mainly to help maintainers updating their packages by
| understanding how to move to more modern constructs.
The fact that it is widely used is IMVHO a reason to mention it here,
not against it: users should learn how to replace it correctly. It
helps users to be certain that they can safely replace AC_FOREACH with
m4_foreach_w.
Would you agree?
Cheers,
Ralf
- document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/14
- Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH, Paul Eggert, 2006/02/15
- Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/15
- Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH, Eric Blake, 2006/02/16
- Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/16
- Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH, Eric Blake, 2006/02/16
- Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/17
- Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH, Stepan Kasal, 2006/02/19
- Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH, Stepan Kasal, 2006/02/20
- Re: document m4_foreach*/AC_FOREACH, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/20