[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:20:57 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Stepan Kasal <address@hidden> writes:
> If $ac_cv_$1 started with "-", set would misinterpret it as option.
Ah, sorry, I didn't catch that. The usual and more general way around
this is as follows:
set x $ac_cv_$1
shift
Since this matches common practice better (and is slightly shorter
overall), wouldn't it be better to do it that way?
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, (continued)
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Noah Misch, 2005/08/16
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/17
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Noah Misch, 2005/08/17
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/18
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/18
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/19
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/19
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/22
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/22
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/23
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/24
- AS_SET_UNEXPANDED_ARGS proposal, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/24
- Re: AS_SET_UNEXPANDED_ARGS proposal, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/25
- Re: AS_SET_UNEXPANDED_ARGS proposal, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/25