Re: Problem with cl and autoconf

[Paul Eggert]

Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:

> In this case their configure would still be subject to latent
> "missing </dev/null" bugs, which means all macro authors would
> still have to carefully use </dev/null anyway.

Yes, that's true.  I guess your method would be better after all.
Perhaps you could code it up?  (The hard part is writing the
documentation and NEWS entry.  :-)