Re: Document actions for AC_CHECK_MEMBERS

[Pavel Roskin]

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Akim Demaille wrote:

>  > The documentation doesn't describe action-if-found and action-if-not-found
>  > for AC_CHECK_MEMBERS.  The description is similar to that of
>  > AC_CHECK_FUNCS, except that "break" doesn't work (I tested it).
>
> That's because I consider this non finished work.  In particular,
> there is no means to know what is the current member being checked.
> You may install it though, maybe adding this warning.

I've applied the patch as is.

I agree that the handling of lists (such as functions, headers, structure
members) needs to be improved and made more uniform.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin