autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: size of (foo) bug (no patch, it's too hard)


From: Russ Allbery
Subject: Re: size of (foo) bug (no patch, it's too hard)
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 21:29:50 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, linux)

Peter Seebach <address@hidden> writes:

> There's two bugs here, one probably easy to fix, one probably hard to
> fix.

Which version of Autoconf are you working from?  As near as I can tell,
Autoconf hasn't used this method to check sizes in quite some time.  It
uses an interesting hack to test sizes when cross-compiling where it asks
boolean questions about the size of variables by converting the questions
to code that will be semantically invalid (and hence rejected by the
compiler) if the answer to the question is false.

-- 
Russ Allbery (address@hidden)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]