Re: Better `failed program' logs

[Paul Eggert]

> From: Akim Demaille <address@hidden>
> Date: 30 Oct 2002 09:30:14 +0100
> 
> This is, IMHO, *much* more useful.

I think so too.

> But... and that's why I'm asking the question before applying it, it
> results in a very significant growth of config.log.

I think it's worth it.

> +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext
> +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF

Can't you replace that with the following, to save a fork+exec?

cat confdefs.h - >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF