[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Autoconf is obsolete ? (Was: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default)
From: |
Ralf Corsepius |
Subject: |
Autoconf is obsolete ? (Was: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default) |
Date: |
13 Feb 2002 21:40:04 +0100 |
Am Mit, 2002-02-13 um 18.46 schrieb Akim Demaille:
> >>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> wrt autoconf, autom4te is nothing but an implementation detail.
> >> Wrt to Autoconf, M4sugar, M4sh, Autotest etc. autom4te is the entry
> >> point.
> Ralf> The only point that matters is the name of tools the user
> Ralf> invokes (The UI if you want to) - M4sugar, M4sh, autotest and
> Ralf> autom4te are not among them and therefore are implementation
> Ralf> details.
>
> Ralf> Or are you really suggesting that users shall invoke autom4te
> Ralf> <whatever> in future?
>
> Yes.
>
To be discussed thoroughly.
At least, I strongly disagree with this _proposal_. Comments, please ...
Ralf
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Jens Petersen, 2002/02/13
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Akim Demaille, 2002/02/13
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Ralf Corsepius, 2002/02/13
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Akim Demaille, 2002/02/13
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Ralf Corsepius, 2002/02/13
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Akim Demaille, 2002/02/13
- Autoconf is obsolete ? (Was: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default),
Ralf Corsepius <=
- Re: Autoconf is obsolete ? (Was: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/02/13
- Re: Autoconf is obsolete ? (Was: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default), Akim Demaille, 2002/02/14