[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fortran 90/95 support (autoconf)
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Fortran 90/95 support (autoconf) |
Date: |
04 Jul 2001 16:57:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor) |
| Hi AKim,
Hi!
Please, keep it public.
| sorry for the long time since my last response; I just don't get stuff
| finished due to my heavy work load in 'real' life. I try to complete the
| patch along the line you suggested today or tomorrow and send it in
| again. Is that early enough?
I no longer schedule this for 2.51, but 2.52. 2.51 should be released
RSN, I'm trying to get help at closing the remaining bugs, have a
round of heavy testing, and then ship it. Say by the end of next
week.
Then I'd like to work on 2.52 with three main targets:
- integrate autom4te
- integrate F 90/95
- integrate C 89 as a language, drop the AC_PROG_CC_STDC approach
dead.
So you have some time ahead.
And anyway, before applying your changes, I think we ought to split
aclang into aclang, aclang-c (C, C 89, C++), and aclang-fortran. We
can debate about the names.
| BTW, I had sent the paper work several
| weeks ago and also got an response and some nice stickers from the GNU
| FSF; so it should be there somewhere.
Good :)
| Thanks for your understanding,
Thanks for your contributing!
| Chris.
|
|
| On 4 Jul, Akim Demaille wrote:
| >>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
| >
| > Akim> Still, we cannot accept your contribution until the FSF agrees,
| > Akim> which means filling a few papers from the `contributing' pages
| > Akim> on gcc.gnu.org.
| >
| > Akim> Thanks a lot for your contribution!
| >
| > I don't think I ever received any answer about your contribution. Are
| > you still interested in seeing this in 2.52?