Re: autoscan -v produces gigabytes of output

[Akim Demaille]

Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:

> Although I have an Ok from Alexandre, I still have mixed feelings about
> the issue. I don't want to spend too much efforts on the issue, but on the
> other hand, my patch removes some functionality that autoscan _pretended_
> to have.

Agreed, I had the same feeling...

> Maybe you have a specific suggestion, I don't know. Anyway, I'll have to
> do it if we decide to print hashes for every file, otherwise the
> performance decrease for the non-verbose mode could be significant.

Two options?